Bài đọc 3
We are living through a boom in greenwashing – the strategic use of comforting environmental claims to disguise business-as-usual pollution. Picture a chief executive whose company emits millions of tonnes of CO₂. Genuine decarbonisation would require bruising boardroom discussions, huge capital outlays, and a complete redesign of the firm’s model. Far easier is to hire a creative agency to plaster products with labels such as “carbon-neutral” or “ret-zero,” calming critics, investors; and even eco-conscious children while emissions continue unsolved. This tactic meets consumers at every turn. Airline websites promise guilt-free flights, petrol pumps boast zero-impact fuel, and even supermarket bacon is marketed as net-zero. Advertising trickery is ancient, yet today’s greenwashing – the practice of deliberately covering ongoing pollution in eco-friendly language – has flourished only recently. The expression surfaced in the 1980s amid oil spills and growing climate science, but the real explosion has come as public anxiety over global heating and biodiversity loss has intensified. Faced with mounting scrutiny, many boards prefer glossy PR to structural reform. Such corporate sleight of hand has become so pervasive that regulators in Europe and the United States are scrambling to tighten rules on environmental claims, yet enforcement still lags behind marketing creativity. The fossil-fuel sector exemplifies the issue. After decades covertly sowing doubt about climate science, oil and gas giants have grasped that direct denial is reputationally toxic. They have therefore swapped their denial tactics for a “green” paint-sprayer, trumpeting token investments in renewables while expanding drilling. Why does this matter? Greenwashing and climate denial share a core objective: to postpone the emission cuts urgently required to avert climate breakdown. Whereas denial invites opposition, greenwashing kills the public into believing problems are already solved. Under this collective illusion, pressure on high-emitting firms evaporates and the radical decisions needed to transform energy, transport, and food systems are delayed indefinitely. Greenwashing thus acts as a soothing lullaby, leading society toward ecological ruin with a tune of comforting half-truths. Exposing this deception is essential if clichés are to be replaced by real, measurable emission cuts.

According to paragraph 1, genuine decarbonisation ______.

Chọn một phương án bên dưới để kiểm tra đáp án ngay:
Đáp án chính thức: B
Hướng dẫn giải chi tiết
Câu hỏi yêu cầu xác định thông tin đúng theo đoạn 1. Đáp án B là chính xác vì nó nêu rõ rằng việc giảm carbon thực sự là tốn kém và đòi hỏi nhiều công sức.
Câu hỏi này trích từ đề thi chính thức:

Đề Thi Chính Thức Môn Tiếng Anh THPT Quốc Gia 2025 - Đề 1101

40 câu hỏi•Thời gian 50 phút•Chấm điểm & giải thích chi tiết

Các câu hỏi khác trong đề (40 câu)

Xem toàn bộ đề →
Câu 12:Which paragraph mentions real time tracking of produce?
Xem →
Câu 13:Which paragraph mentions a preventive measure against biological threats?
Xem →
Câu 14:Mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the best arrangement of utterances or sentences to make a cohesive and coheren
Xem →
Câu 15:Mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the best arrangement of utterances or sentences to make a cohesive and coheren
Xem →
Câu 16:Mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the best arrangement of utterances or sentences to make a cohesive and coheren
Xem →
Câu 17:Mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the best arrangement of utterances or sentences to make a cohesive and coheren
Xem →
Câu 18:Mark the letter A, B, C or D on your answer sheet to indicate the best arrangement of utterances or sentences to make a cohesive and coheren
Xem →
Câu 19:According to paragraph 1, genuine decarbonisation .
Xem →
Câu 20:Which of the following best summarises paragraph 1?
Xem →
Câu 21:Which of the following is NOT stated as an example of greenwashed products or services?
Xem →
Câu 22:The word glossy in paragraph 2 mostly means .
Xem →
Câu 23:The word They in paragraph 2 refers to .
Xem →
Câu 24:Which of the following best paraphrases the underlined sentence in paragraph 3?
Xem →
Câu 25:According to the passage, the adoption of “green” paint by fossil-fuel companies is mentioned as .
Xem →
Câu 26:Indicate the word whose underlined part differs from the other three in pronunciation.
Xem →
Đọc hiểu (Reading) • Lớp 10, 11, 12

Bài tập trắc nghiệm cùng chuyên đề: Đọc hiểu: thông tin chi tiết (59 câu)

Câu luyện thêm 1Trích từ: Đề Thi Chính Thức Môn Tiếng Anh THPT Quốc Gia 2025 - Đề 1102
According to paragraph 1, having products claimed as eco-friendly rather than conducting meaningful decarbonisation will ______.
Xem trang câu hỏi →
Câu luyện thêm 2Trích từ: Đề Thi Chính Thức Môn Tiếng Anh THPT Quốc Gia 2025 - Đề 1103
According to paragraph 1, having products claimed as eco-friendly rather than conducting meaningful decarbonisation will ______.
Xem trang câu hỏi →
Câu luyện thêm 3Trích từ: Đề Thi Chính Thức Môn Tiếng Anh THPT Quốc Gia 2025 - Đề 1102
What challenge do regulators face in monitoring greenwashing claims?
Xem trang câu hỏi →
Câu luyện thêm 4Trích từ: Đề Thi Chính Thức Môn Tiếng Anh THPT Quốc Gia 2025 - Đề 1103
What challenge do regulators face in monitoring greenwashing claims?
Xem trang câu hỏi →
Câu luyện thêm 5Trích từ: Đề Thi Chính Thức Môn Tiếng Anh THPT Quốc Gia 2020 - Đề 403
According to paragraph 1, educators believe that through field trips, children can _____
Xem trang câu hỏi →
Câu luyện thêm 6Trích từ: Đề Thi Chính Thức Môn Tiếng Anh THPT Quốc Gia 2021 - Đề 401
According paragraph 1, the special floor creates electricity when______.
Xem trang câu hỏi →

Muốn biết hiện tại bạn đạt khoảng bao nhiêu điểm ở môn này? Làm thử đề nhanh 15 phút để hệ thống chấm điểm ngay.

Làm đề nhanh 15 phút ngay